Peter Kieser

Dreams are today's answers to tomorrow's questions.

Poll: 42% of Vancouver Point Grey voters would recall Campbell

without comments

Poll: 42% of Vancouver Point Grey voters would recall Campbell.

A B.C. Federation of Labour news release this morning cited a new Environics Poll showing 42 percent of voters in Vancouver Point Grey would sign a petition to recall Campbell, including a quarter of those who voted for him in May.

Written by Peter

September 21st, 2009 at 10:08 am

Posted in Politics

Suppressed Texas Instruments cryptographic signing keys

without comments

This are the OS signing keys for different Texas Instruments calculators. The key for the TI-83 calculator was first published by someone at the unitedti.org forum in this message: http://www.unitedti.org/index.php?showtopic=8888. He or she needed several months to crack it. The other keys were found after a few weeks by the unitedti.org community through a distributed computing project. The keys make it possible to sign your own operating system for the Texas Instruments calculators.

Texas Instruments now contacted several people with a DMCA notice to take down the keys from their websites. Some of the websites which got a DMCA notice are: unitedti.org, brandonw.net and reddit.com. One of these DCMA notices can be found here: http://brandonw.net/calcstuff/DMCA_notice.txt

Here are the three keys:

TI-83 (Plus):

n=82EF4009ED7CAC2A5EE12B5F8E8AD9A0
AB9CC9F4F3E44B7E8BF2D57A2F2BEACE
83424E1CFF0D2A5A7E2E53CB926D61F3
47DFAA4B35B205B5881CEB40B328E58F
p=B709D3A0CD2FEC08EAFCCF540D8A100BB38E5E091D646ADB7B14D021096FFCD
q=B7207BD184E0B5A0B89832AA68849B29EDFB03FBA2E8917B176504F08A96246CB
d=4D0534BA8BB2BFA0740BFB6562E843C7
EC7A58AE351CE11D43438CA239DD9927
6CD125FEBAEE5D2696579FA3A3958FF4FC54C685EAA91723BC8888F292947BA1
e=11

TI-84 (Plus):

prp77 factor: 67070508990537181066342707695603050521324524613874331879259881495826493920589
prp78 factor: 186923771200711284770368041572205320486346816476524340240220962467860568859381

n=EF5FEF0B0AB6E22731C17539658B2E91E53A59BF8E00FCC81D05758F26C1791CD35AF6101B1E35
43AC3E78FD8BB8F37FC8FE85601C502EABC9132CEAD4711CB1
p=94489014C63CC9E1E1ADB192DBBDD1F78F90A630DA9C86EFC4CBCA44E5B4D54D
q=19D431AF2794229620B884E3750D622D1C74F2E4569DC15486FC8D5A3BCDFE2F5
d=2A3E1B2010F318D9BD7C7E19300980B055A0E2A9554B77E7142E23CDF7C7CA13C233A3D462FDFC
968B1F9CEAF2AC2CF305147992AD9E834192ACEBB517DB9941
e=11

TI-89:

prp76 factor: 2231124525637629443181963045297394875470510167130210300957267082210173784611
prp79 factor: 3226885534240147415018248397410101286362761128614350056368675111071170873486957

(these are factors of 71995834568684773636720438651160472297127884480206535156843307841378050889714332
73011970552138960583799368215373582308591928985045059261105298431035818727)

Written by Peter

September 21st, 2009 at 9:39 am

Posted in Technical

Jack Layton Response to the Canadian DMCA (Bill C-61)

without comments

Thank you for sharing your concern over Bill C-61, An Act to amend the Copyright Act.

The NDP is strongly opposed to this bill and we are calling on MPs from other parties to listen to their constituents and join us in the growing chorus against it. Rather, we are pushing for legislation that will ensure that artists and creators are compensated for their work but that also ensures consumers are able to enjoy reasonable rights of access.

Over the past two years we have urged the government to consult with stakeholders and develop legislation that would protect artists, innovators and consumers in the 21st century. Unfortunately, the government has completely ignored calls to bring forward reasonable copyright legislation. In fact, this bill is worse than originally feared. There is no evidence of an attempt to strike any reasonable balance that would protect either artists or consumers. Instead, we are faced with a full capitulation to the U.S. corporate lobby that will pave the way for the criminalization of perfectly reasonable behaviour (like format shifting of most legally purchased content).

What can you do? If you haven't already, contact the Ministers of Industry and Heritage, the Prime Minister, the leaders of the other opposition parties, and your local MP to tell them that you oppose this piece of legislation. Encourage your friends and families to do the same. For contact information, please visit: http://www.parl.gc.ca/common/index.asp?Language=E. Your participation will be important to making the opposition to this bill impossible to ignore.

Again, I appreciate the time you have taken to register your views and concerns about this important issue. Feel free to pass along my email to anyone who may be interested. All the best.

Sincerely,

Jack Layton, MP (Toronto-Danforth)
Leader, Canada’s New Democrats

Written by Peter

June 19th, 2008 at 2:52 pm

Posted in Politics

Layered Technologies: dedicated hosting provider to avoid

without comments

Layered Technologies, Inc. has decided to raise their prices again. The other day I woke up to an e-mail with the subject "Layered Technologies Pricing Update – Effective July 1, 2008", stating that they would be increasing the price of each of my works' servers by $28 dollars a month, this works out to a 21% price increase per server; This brings my works' AMD Athlon 64 3200+'s to an outrageous $160/Mo.

At Layered Technologies we are proud of the pioneering role we've played in the unmanaged server hosting market, as well as the trust we've developed within our community of thousands of clients and partners. We know that this trust is dependent on a number of factors including our ability to provide excellent customer service, market leading products, and highly available facilities and infrastructure. We also know it is imperative that we put in place the tools that allow us to provide more value and higher levels of service to those who depend on us and, like most other businesses, our underlying costs for providing these services have increased dramatically in the past year. As a result it has become necessary to adjust our pricing effective July 1, 2008.

I have never, in all my years of working in the IT industry heard of a data centre raising the prices of their dedicated hosting clients to such a great degree. This is not the first price increase that Layered Technologies has forced on their clients, if my memory serves correct this is the second price increase in less than a year. While Layered Technologies has stated in their email that they have a “technology refresh” available, I received the following e-mail when enquiring about having my server hardware upgraded:

Hello,

Unfortunately we are not offering free hardware upgrades. Please see our specials page here:

http://www.layeredtech.com/dedicated-servers/specials.php

Thanks,
Hallie

*******************************************

Hallie Weaver
Sales – Account Manager
1-866-584-6784 x 7038 > Toll Free
972-398-7083 > Direct
972-398-7055 > Fax
hallie.weaver@layeredtechnologies.com
Layered Technologies, Inc.

On-Demand Utility Computing & Hosting Solutions
Learn more>> http://www.layeredtechnologies.com

Join us! LT\\\'s 3rd Annual LT PACT 2008
Hosting Transformation Conference (June 25-27)
Las Vegas, NV – Caesars Palace www.ltpact.com

*****************************************

Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this transmission is legally privileged and confidential, intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of the email and delete the message. Thank you.

They are telling me that it's cheaper to replace my server, and go through the effort of transitioning over all my software than to simply upgrade my hardware? This is a provider to avoid using if you do not want to deal with unexpected price increases and shoddy support. There is a large thread on Web Hosting Talk regarding the price increases. I suggest if you are looking for hosting I suggest you take your business elsewhere. Layered Technologies does not warrant the premium that they are charging for their services.

Written by Peter

June 2nd, 2008 at 3:47 pm

Posted in Technical

Canadian DMCA "placed on paper"

without comments

The Canadian DMCA has been placed on paper as expected, please consider writing your MP and visiting Prentice's open house if you can.

Written by Peter

December 7th, 2007 at 2:19 pm

Posted in Politics

"Fair Copyright for Canada" on Facebook

without comments

Michael Geist has launched a Facebook "campaign" called Fair Copyright Canada aimed at informing the average joe about the up and coming Canadian copyright "reform". He focuses on helping people contact their member of parliament and inform friends and family about the downsides of the new copyright reform legislation in the works.

I believe that this is an important issue and one that needs looking into, there should be a balance between copyright holders rights and the citizens rights (eg. bypassing DRM for backups, format shifting and time shifting.)

In other news, it appears that Vancouver wants to ban smoking Hookah houses. What exactly is the point of this? People go to these places to smoke tobacco, if you are a non-smoker there is no reason for you to go there.

Written by Peter

December 6th, 2007 at 2:53 pm

Posted in Politics

Blogger and OpenID for commenting

without comments

Google has announced that they have included OpenID commenting support on Blogger in Draft. OpenID comments will work in both "Anyone" and "Registered Users" modes.

They will be testing it on draft before moving it to the main site, and plan to have support for OpenID provider on Blogger (!).

Written by Peter

November 30th, 2007 at 12:45 pm

Posted in Technical

Ways to write your MP about Copyright reform

without comments

Yesterday I blogged about the Canadian DMCA, and the effects it will have on the Canadian consumer — I also recommend that you write your Member of Parliament (MP) regarding the issue, here are some ideas that you can include in a letter to your MP (Modified list courtesy of Russel McOrmond at Digital Copyright Canada):

  • Pressure for this bill came largely from the United States, and does not protect Canadian interests.
  • We should be learning from the mistakes of the United States, not duplicate them.
  • Canada's copyright law is not "weaker" than the United States, just different. Canada's Copyright Act is stronger than the United States in many respects.
  • Anti-circumvention is based on flawed policy conceived before the Internet became popular. It suggests that if new technology can be abused to infringe copyright, that private citizens should not be allowed to own and control their own technology. The new economy is dependent on private citizens controlling their technology and fully participating.
  • Hundreds of Canadians have already signed the "Petition to protect Information Technology property rights" that opposes anti-circumvention legislation in Canada. Thousands have signed the "Petition for Users' Rights" which calls for balance in the legislation between the rights of past copyright holders and "users" which includes creators of new works.
  • Canada has no obligation to ratify these treaties — signing is to ratifying like dating is to marriage. We should instead be working at WIPO to amend these treaties to fix flawed thinking.
  • That all MPs need to become informed on this issue so that the future of Canada's position in the knowledge economy can be protected. This should not be left entirely to Heritage or Industry given this policy has implications across all areas of policy.

To find your MP, use the Postal Code Lookup on the Government of Canada site. Remember, sending mail to your MP is free!

Written by Peter

November 29th, 2007 at 10:59 am

Posted in Politics

"Canadian" DMCA – Worst copyright legislation in the first world

without comments

Michael Geist reports that the "Canadian" (and I put Canadian in quotes because it's exactly the same as the DMCA without fair-use provisions — an American entertainment industry bill) copyright legislation update is going to be most likely fast tracked in the new year and supported by the Conservative and Liberal (and most likely the Bloc) governments. The updated copyright legislation will be even worse than the last Canadian copyright proposal, the defeated Bill C-60.

The legislation will contain anti-circumvention clause that prohibits breaking the locks off your music and movies in order to move them to new devices or watch them after the company that made them goes out of business, or decides to stop authorizing you to watch your purchase. There will be no flexible fair-use ideals — no parody, time shifting (such as recording a TV show and watching it later when it is convenient for you), device shifting (copying a Music CD to your MP3 Player) or expanded backup provisions.

This legislation will make criminals out of most Canadians, whom participate in most of these activities on a daily basis. Please consider writing your Member of Parliament or following Michael Geist's 30 Things You Can Do about DMCA-like legislations.

Edit: I have made a post about ways to write your MP in regards to the current legislation attempt.

Written by Peter

November 29th, 2007 at 12:00 am

Posted in Politics

Canadian copyright bill "update" just "weeks away"

without comments

The Ottawa Citizen confirms that the revised Copyright act "will be tabled in the next four weeks", this is a direct result of increased pressure from the United States and lobbyist organizations.

Increasing reliance on intellectual property by strengthing copyright laws for large corporations is not a sure way to economic success, it makes us too reliant on our ideas and not on being a industrial nation that can produce it's own goods. Canada is slowly going down the same slippery economic slope as the United States, which is a sure-fire way to create a depression.

When will the government (and the industry — mainly entertainment) realise that passing laws to prop up a failing business model will not be successful? When will the Canadian government (be it Conservative or Liberal), learn from the mistakes of our "friendly" next door neighbour?

Written by Peter

November 17th, 2007 at 1:24 am

Posted in Politics