<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Peter Kieser &#187; Technical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterkieser.com/category/technical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterkieser.com</link>
	<description>Apathy has replaced guns.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:59:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Linux RAID mdraid &quot;stripe_cache_size&quot; vs. transfer rate</title>
		<link>http://peterkieser.com/2009/11/29/raid-mdraid-stripe_cache_size-vs-write-transfer/</link>
		<comments>http://peterkieser.com/2009/11/29/raid-mdraid-stripe_cache_size-vs-write-transfer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkieser.com/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part of the Linux RAID mdraid RAID6 &#38; RAID5 benchmarks, and Linux RAID mdraid RAID10, RAID0 benchmarks (continued) series. Generated with the following shell script: #!/bin/bash for cache_size in 256 512 768 1024 2048 4096 8192 16834 32768; do for i in {1..3}; do echo ${cache_size} &#62; /sys/block/md0/md/stripe_cache_size sync echo 3 &#62; /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches echo "stripe_cache_size: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the <a href="/2009/11/27/linux-raid-mdraid-raid6-raid5-benchmarks/">Linux RAID mdraid RAID6 &amp; RAID5 benchmarks</a>, and <a href="/2009/11/27/linux-raid-mdraid-raid10-raid0-benchmarks-continued/">Linux RAID mdraid RAID10, RAID0 benchmarks (continued)</a> series.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-152" title="&quot;stripe_cache_size&quot; vs. transfer rate" src="http://peterkieser.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/stripe_cache_size2.png" alt="&quot;stripe_cache_size&quot; vs. transfer rate" width="613" height="414" /></p>
<p>Generated with the following shell script:</p>
<pre>#!/bin/bash
for cache_size in 256 512 768 1024 2048 4096 8192 16834 32768; do
 for i in {1..3}; do
 echo ${cache_size} &gt; /sys/block/md0/md/stripe_cache_size
 sync
 echo 3 &gt; /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
 echo "stripe_cache_size: ${cache_size} (${i}/3)"
 # for write
 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md0 bs=3145728 count=5460
 # for read
 dd if=/dev/md0 of=/dev/null bs=3145728 count=5460
 done
done</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterkieser.com/2009/11/29/raid-mdraid-stripe_cache_size-vs-write-transfer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux RAID mdraid RAID10, RAID0 benchmarks (continued)</title>
		<link>http://peterkieser.com/2009/11/27/linux-raid-mdraid-raid10-raid0-benchmarks-continued/</link>
		<comments>http://peterkieser.com/2009/11/27/linux-raid-mdraid-raid10-raid0-benchmarks-continued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkieser.com/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continued from Linux RAID mdraid RAID6 &#38; RAID5 benchmarks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continued from <a href="/2009/11/27/linux-raid-mdraid-raid6-raid5-benchmarks/">Linux RAID mdraid RAID6 &amp; RAID5 benchmarks</a>.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-141" title="RAID mdraid Output/Input bonnie++" src="http://peterkieser.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/mdraid-overall.PNG" alt="RAID mdraid Output/Input bonnie++" width="642" height="443" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-143" title="RAID mdraid Output bonnie++" src="http://peterkieser.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/mdraid-overalloutput.PNG" alt="RAID mdraid Output bonnie++" width="642" height="443" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-142" title="RAID mdraid Input bonnie++" src="http://peterkieser.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/mdraid-overallinput.PNG" alt="RAID mdraid Input bonnie++" width="642" height="443" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterkieser.com/2009/11/27/linux-raid-mdraid-raid10-raid0-benchmarks-continued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux RAID mdraid RAID6 &amp; RAID5 benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://peterkieser.com/2009/11/27/linux-raid-mdraid-raid6-raid5-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://peterkieser.com/2009/11/27/linux-raid-mdraid-raid6-raid5-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkieser.com/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Building a new file server, and thought I should post some benchmarks with mdraid RAID6 and RAID5 on Ubuntu 9.10 AMD64 with XFS, specifications for the machine are as follows: Specifications Intel Pentium D E6300 2.80Ghz Gigabyte P45-UD3P 2 2GB DDR2-800 CL5 (4GB total) 6 1.5TB WDC Green 7200RPM (WD15EADS) on ICH10R (mdraid) 1 250GB [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Building a new file server, and thought I should post some benchmarks with mdraid RAID6 and RAID5 on Ubuntu 9.10 AMD64 with XFS, specifications for the machine are as follows:</p>
<h2>Specifications</h2>
<p>Intel Pentium D E6300 2.80Ghz<br />
Gigabyte P45-UD3P<br />
<strong>2</strong> 2GB DDR2-800 CL5 (4GB total)<br />
<strong>6</strong> 1.5TB WDC Green 7200RPM (WD15EADS) on ICH10R (mdraid)<br />
<strong>1</strong> 250GB Seagate 7200RPM (ST3250410AS) on JMicron JMB363</p>
<p>The mdraid will be run on the ICH10R, and the boot device (and operating sytsem) on the JMicron controller. Here are the benchmark results. All are using default XFS settings, benchmarks taken with bonnie++.</p>
<h2>RAID6 mdraid Benchmarks</h2>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-129" title="RAID6 mdraid Benchmarks" src="http://peterkieser.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/mdraid-raid6.PNG" alt="RAID6 mdraid Benchmarks" width="483" height="291" /></p>
<p><strong>RAID6 64k</strong></p>
<pre>Version 1.03c       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
devil2           8G 88390  99 175541  25 88470  17 51515  80 289555  27 389.0   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16  2419  15 +++++ +++  1219   5  1502   9 +++++ +++   920   4
devil2,8G,88390,99,175541,25,88470,17,51515,80,289555,27,389.0,0,16,2419,15,+++++,+++,1219,5,1502,9,+++++,+++,920,4</pre>
<p><strong>RAID6 128k</strong></p>
<pre>Version 1.03c       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
devil2           8G 88849  99 174076  24 84382  15 58716  80 291795  27 406.7   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16  1254   4 +++++ +++   619   2   802   2 +++++ +++   668   2
devil2,8G,88849,99,174076,24,84382,15,58716,80,291795,27,406.7,0,16,1254,4,+++++,+++,619,2,802,2,+++++,+++,668,2</pre>
<p><strong>RAID6 256k</strong></p>
<pre>Version 1.03c       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
devil2           8G 82659  92 89437  12 64420  11 85758  95 214792  19 368.5   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16  1237   6 +++++ +++   697   4   812   3 +++++ +++   673   3
devil2,8G,82659,92,89437,12,64420,11,85758,95,214792,19,368.5,0,16,1237,6,+++++,+++,697,4,812,3,+++++,+++,673,3</pre>
<p><strong>RAID6 512k</strong></p>
<pre>Version 1.03c       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
devil2           8G 88844  99 125203  17 70935  12 76991  91 288147  26 402.1   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16  2231  11 +++++ +++   820   3  1669   7 +++++ +++   808   3
devil2,8G,88844,99,125203,17,70935,12,76991,91,288147,26,402.1,0,16,2231,11,+++++,+++,820,3,1669,7,+++++,+++,808,3</pre>
<h2>RAID5 mdraid Benchmarks</h2>
<h2><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-130" title="RAID5 mdraid Benchmarks" src="http://peterkieser.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/mdraid-raid5.PNG" alt="RAID5 mdraid Benchmarks" width="483" height="291" /></h2>
<p><strong>RAID5 64k</strong></p>
<pre>Version 1.03c       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
devil2           8G 88705  99 211212  30 103889  20 49043  75 360385  29 406.8   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16  1081   2 +++++ +++   646   1   889   2 +++++ +++   634   1
devil2,8G,88705,99,211212,30,103889,20,49043,75,360385,29,406.8,0,16,1081,2,+++++,+++,646,1,889,2,+++++,+++,634,1</pre>
<p><strong>RAID5 128k</strong></p>
<pre>Version 1.03c       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
devil2           8G 88323  99 193034  28 101348  19 58707  79 337775  30 380.5   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16  1086  14 +++++ +++   683   3   917   3 +++++ +++   586   1
devil2,8G,88323,99,193034,28,101348,19,58707,79,337775,30,380.5,0,16,1086,14,+++++,+++,683,3,917,3,+++++,+++,586,1</pre>
<p><strong>RAID5 256k</strong></p>
<pre>Version 1.03c       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
devil2           8G 88898  99 188605  26 92387  16 68355  86 357395  32 395.7   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16   888   1 +++++ +++   660   2   820   1 +++++ +++   570   1
devil2,8G,88898,99,188605,26,92387,16,68355,86,357395,32,395.7,0,16,888,1,+++++,+++,660,2,820,1,+++++,+++,570,1</pre>
<p><strong>RAID5 512k</strong></p>
<pre>Version 1.03c       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
devil2           8G 88868  99 147612  21 80418  13 80604  93 411211  36 387.4   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16   888   1 +++++ +++   613   1   855   1 +++++ +++   610   1
devil2,8G,88868,99,147612,21,80418,13,80604,93,411211,36,387.4,0,16,888,1,+++++,+++,613,1,855,1,+++++,+++,610,1</pre>
<h2>Overall RAID mdraid Benchmarks</h2>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-131" title="Overall RAID mdraid Benchmarks" src="http://peterkieser.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/mdraid-raid56.PNG" alt="Overall RAID mdraid Benchmarks" width="483" height="291" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterkieser.com/2009/11/27/linux-raid-mdraid-raid6-raid5-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suppressed Texas Instruments cryptographic signing keys</title>
		<link>http://peterkieser.com/2009/09/21/suppressed-texas-instruments-cryptographic-signing-keys/</link>
		<comments>http://peterkieser.com/2009/09/21/suppressed-texas-instruments-cryptographic-signing-keys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkieser.com/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This are the OS signing keys for different Texas Instruments calculators. The key for the TI-83 calculator was first published by someone at the unitedti.org forum in this message: http://www.unitedti.org/index.php?showtopic=8888. He or she needed several months to crack it. The other keys were found after a few weeks by the unitedti.org community through a distributed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This are the OS signing keys for different Texas Instruments calculators. The key for the TI-83 calculator was first published by someone at the unitedti.org forum in this message: http://www.unitedti.org/index.php?showtopic=8888. He or she needed several months to crack it. The other keys were found after a few weeks by the unitedti.org community through a distributed computing project. The keys make it possible to sign your own operating system for the Texas Instruments calculators.</p>
<p>Texas Instruments now contacted several people with a DMCA notice to take down the keys from their websites. Some of the websites which got a DMCA notice are: unitedti.org, brandonw.net and reddit.com. One of these DCMA notices can be found here: http://brandonw.net/calcstuff/DMCA_notice.txt</p>
<p>Here are the three keys:</p>
<p>TI-83 (Plus):</p>
<p>n=82EF4009ED7CAC2A5EE12B5F8E8AD9A0<br />
AB9CC9F4F3E44B7E8BF2D57A2F2BEACE<br />
83424E1CFF0D2A5A7E2E53CB926D61F3<br />
47DFAA4B35B205B5881CEB40B328E58F<br />
p=B709D3A0CD2FEC08EAFCCF540D8A100BB38E5E091D646ADB7B14D021096FFCD<br />
q=B7207BD184E0B5A0B89832AA68849B29EDFB03FBA2E8917B176504F08A96246CB<br />
d=4D0534BA8BB2BFA0740BFB6562E843C7<br />
EC7A58AE351CE11D43438CA239DD9927<br />
6CD125FEBAEE5D2696579FA3A3958FF4FC54C685EAA91723BC8888F292947BA1<br />
e=11</p>
<p>TI-84 (Plus):</p>
<p>prp77 factor: 67070508990537181066342707695603050521324524613874331879259881495826493920589<br />
prp78 factor: 186923771200711284770368041572205320486346816476524340240220962467860568859381</p>
<p>n=EF5FEF0B0AB6E22731C17539658B2E91E53A59BF8E00FCC81D05758F26C1791CD35AF6101B1E35<br />
43AC3E78FD8BB8F37FC8FE85601C502EABC9132CEAD4711CB1<br />
p=94489014C63CC9E1E1ADB192DBBDD1F78F90A630DA9C86EFC4CBCA44E5B4D54D<br />
q=19D431AF2794229620B884E3750D622D1C74F2E4569DC15486FC8D5A3BCDFE2F5<br />
d=2A3E1B2010F318D9BD7C7E19300980B055A0E2A9554B77E7142E23CDF7C7CA13C233A3D462FDFC<br />
968B1F9CEAF2AC2CF305147992AD9E834192ACEBB517DB9941<br />
e=11</p>
<p>TI-89:</p>
<p>prp76 factor: 2231124525637629443181963045297394875470510167130210300957267082210173784611<br />
prp79 factor: 3226885534240147415018248397410101286362761128614350056368675111071170873486957</p>
<p>(these are factors of 71995834568684773636720438651160472297127884480206535156843307841378050889714332<br />
73011970552138960583799368215373582308591928985045059261105298431035818727)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterkieser.com/2009/09/21/suppressed-texas-instruments-cryptographic-signing-keys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Layered Technologies: dedicated hosting provider to avoid</title>
		<link>http://peterkieser.com/2008/06/02/layered-technologies-dedicated-hosting-provider-to-avoid/</link>
		<comments>http://peterkieser.com/2008/06/02/layered-technologies-dedicated-hosting-provider-to-avoid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 22:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkieser.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Layered Technologies, Inc. has decided to raise their prices again. The other day I woke up to an e-mail with the subject &#034;Layered Technologies Pricing Update &#8211; Effective July 1, 2008&#034;, stating that they would be increasing the price of each of my works&#039; servers by $28 dollars a month, this works out to a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.layeredtech.com/" target="_blank">Layered Technologies, Inc.</a> has decided to raise their prices again. The other day I woke up to an e-mail with the subject &#034;Layered Technologies Pricing Update &#8211; Effective July 1, 2008&#034;, stating that they would be increasing the price of each of my works&#039; servers by <strong>$28 dollars a month</strong>, this works out to a 21% price increase per server; This brings my works&#039; AMD Athlon 64 3200+&#039;s to an outrageous $160/Mo.</p>
<blockquote><p>At Layered Technologies we are proud of the pioneering role we&#039;ve played in the unmanaged server hosting market, as well as the trust we&#039;ve developed within our community of thousands of clients and partners. We know that this trust is dependent on a number of factors including our ability to provide excellent customer service, market leading products, and highly available facilities and infrastructure. We also know it is imperative that we put in place the tools that allow us to provide more value and higher levels of service to those who depend on us and, like most other businesses, our underlying costs for providing these services have increased dramatically in the past year. As a result it has become necessary to adjust our pricing effective July 1, 2008.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have never, in all my years of working in the IT industry heard of a data centre raising the prices of their dedicated hosting clients to such a great degree. This is not the first price increase that Layered Technologies has forced on their clients, if my memory serves correct this is the second price increase in less than a year. While Layered Technologies has stated in their email that they have a “technology              refresh” available, I received the following e-mail when enquiring about having my server hardware upgraded:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hello,</p>
<p>Unfortunately we are not offering free hardware upgrades. Please see our specials page here:</p>
<p>http://www.layeredtech.com/dedicated-servers/specials.php</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Hallie</p>
<p>*******************************************</p>
<p>Hallie Weaver<br />
Sales &#8211; Account Manager<br />
1-866-584-6784 x 7038 &gt; Toll Free<br />
972-398-7083 &gt; Direct<br />
972-398-7055 &gt; Fax<br />
hallie.weaver@layeredtechnologies.com<br />
Layered Technologies, Inc.</p>
<p>On-Demand Utility Computing &amp; Hosting Solutions<br />
Learn more&gt;&gt; http://www.layeredtechnologies.com</p>
<p>Join us!  LT\\\&#039;s 3rd Annual LT PACT 2008<br />
Hosting Transformation Conference (June 25-27)<br />
Las Vegas, NV &#8211; Caesars Palace www.ltpact.com</p>
<p>*****************************************</p>
<p>Confidentiality Note:  The information contained in this transmission is legally privileged and confidential, intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of the email and delete the message. Thank you.</p></blockquote>
<p>They are telling me that it&#039;s cheaper to replace my server, and go through the effort of transitioning over all my software than to simply upgrade my hardware? This is a provider to avoid using if you do not want to deal with unexpected price increases and shoddy support. There is a <a href="http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=696677" target="_blank">large thread</a> on Web Hosting Talk regarding the price increases. I suggest if you are looking for hosting I suggest you take your business elsewhere. Layered Technologies does not warrant the premium that they are charging for their services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterkieser.com/2008/06/02/layered-technologies-dedicated-hosting-provider-to-avoid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogger and OpenID for commenting</title>
		<link>http://peterkieser.com/2007/11/30/blogger-and-openid-for-commenting/</link>
		<comments>http://peterkieser.com/2007/11/30/blogger-and-openid-for-commenting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lovethisgame.net/2007/11/30/blogger-and-openid-for-commenting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has announced that they have included OpenID commenting support on Blogger in Draft. OpenID comments will work in both &#034;Anyone&#034; and &#034;Registered Users&#034; modes. They will be testing it on draft before moving it to the main site, and plan to have support for OpenID provider on Blogger (!).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has <a href="http://bloggerindraft.blogspot.com/2007/11/new-feature-openid-commenting.html" target="_blank">announced</a> that they have included OpenID commenting support on <a href="http://draft.blogger.com">Blogger in Draft</a>. OpenID comments will work in both &#034;Anyone&#034; and &#034;Registered Users&#034; modes.</p>
<p>They will be testing it on draft before moving it to the main site, and plan to have support for OpenID provider on Blogger (!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterkieser.com/2007/11/30/blogger-and-openid-for-commenting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
