Peter Kieser

Fight against HST ramps up, via CKNW.

A citizen's initiative application to kill the incoming H-S-T has been approved by Elections BC.

The initiative petition is a legally binding petition that, if successful, will require the BC government to hold a referendum on the H-S-T, or repeal it in the legislature.

I, really hope that this initiative passes. I will most likely be part of the petitioners. I do not believe that we need a "harmonized" tax that will raise the prices of a large majority of my day to day activities.

If we had exemptions like the maritime provinces do, it would be okay. But as the HST is, it's a big giant lie in British Columbia.

Canadian gov't using lies to sell Internet wiretapping law.

Michael Geist sez, "The Canadian government has introduced Internet surveillance legislation that requires ISPs to disclose customer information without a warrant. Peter Van Loan, the Minister in charge, claims that a Vancouver kidnapping earlier this year shows the need for these powers. I did some digging and shows this to be a lie – the Vancouver police acknowledge that the case did not involve an ISP request and the suspect is now in custody."

Climate goal eased for B.C.'s public sector – The Globe and Mail.

B.C.'s Minister for Climate Action has granted the province's public sector an extra two years to meet carbon-emission targets.

I'm confused, I thought the BC Liberals were all about the environment? That's why we have the Carbon Tax, is it not? But then, I forgot it's perfectly acceptable to tax the middle class and poor, but it's not okay to tax buddies of the BC Liberals.

How can a corporation be carbon neutral? I'm sorry, but I don't buy this whole "carbon credit" scam that is going on as of late.

YouTube – Jack Layton: Party For Sale or Rent.

At least Jack Layton has a sense of humour, unlike Harper and Iggy.

Poll: 42% of Vancouver Point Grey voters would recall Campbell.

A B.C. Federation of Labour news release this morning cited a new Environics Poll showing 42 percent of voters in Vancouver Point Grey would sign a petition to recall Campbell, including a quarter of those who voted for him in May.

Thank you for sharing your concern over Bill C-61, An Act to amend the Copyright Act.

The NDP is strongly opposed to this bill and we are calling on MPs from other parties to listen to their constituents and join us in the growing chorus against it. Rather, we are pushing for legislation that will ensure that artists and creators are compensated for their work but that also ensures consumers are able to enjoy reasonable rights of access.

Over the past two years we have urged the government to consult with stakeholders and develop legislation that would protect artists, innovators and consumers in the 21st century. Unfortunately, the government has completely ignored calls to bring forward reasonable copyright legislation. In fact, this bill is worse than originally feared. There is no evidence of an attempt to strike any reasonable balance that would protect either artists or consumers. Instead, we are faced with a full capitulation to the U.S. corporate lobby that will pave the way for the criminalization of perfectly reasonable behaviour (like format shifting of most legally purchased content).

What can you do? If you haven't already, contact the Ministers of Industry and Heritage, the Prime Minister, the leaders of the other opposition parties, and your local MP to tell them that you oppose this piece of legislation. Encourage your friends and families to do the same. For contact information, please visit: http://www.parl.gc.ca/common/index.asp?Language=E. Your participation will be important to making the opposition to this bill impossible to ignore.

Again, I appreciate the time you have taken to register your views and concerns about this important issue. Feel free to pass along my email to anyone who may be interested. All the best.

Sincerely,

Jack Layton, MP (Toronto-Danforth)
Leader, Canada’s New Democrats

The Canadian DMCA has been placed on paper as expected, please consider writing your MP and visiting Prentice's open house if you can.

Michael Geist has launched a Facebook "campaign" called Fair Copyright Canada aimed at informing the average joe about the up and coming Canadian copyright "reform". He focuses on helping people contact their member of parliament and inform friends and family about the downsides of the new copyright reform legislation in the works.

I believe that this is an important issue and one that needs looking into, there should be a balance between copyright holders rights and the citizens rights (eg. bypassing DRM for backups, format shifting and time shifting.)

In other news, it appears that Vancouver wants to ban smoking Hookah houses. What exactly is the point of this? People go to these places to smoke tobacco, if you are a non-smoker there is no reason for you to go there.

Yesterday I blogged about the Canadian DMCA, and the effects it will have on the Canadian consumer — I also recommend that you write your Member of Parliament (MP) regarding the issue, here are some ideas that you can include in a letter to your MP (Modified list courtesy of Russel McOrmond at Digital Copyright Canada):

• Pressure for this bill came largely from the United States, and does not protect Canadian interests.
• We should be learning from the mistakes of the United States, not duplicate them.
• Canada's copyright law is not "weaker" than the United States, just different. Canada's Copyright Act is stronger than the United States in many respects.
• Anti-circumvention is based on flawed policy conceived before the Internet became popular. It suggests that if new technology can be abused to infringe copyright, that private citizens should not be allowed to own and control their own technology. The new economy is dependent on private citizens controlling their technology and fully participating.
• Hundreds of Canadians have already signed the "Petition to protect Information Technology property rights" that opposes anti-circumvention legislation in Canada. Thousands have signed the "Petition for Users' Rights" which calls for balance in the legislation between the rights of past copyright holders and "users" which includes creators of new works.
• Canada has no obligation to ratify these treaties — signing is to ratifying like dating is to marriage. We should instead be working at WIPO to amend these treaties to fix flawed thinking.
• That all MPs need to become informed on this issue so that the future of Canada's position in the knowledge economy can be protected. This should not be left entirely to Heritage or Industry given this policy has implications across all areas of policy.

To find your MP, use the Postal Code Lookup on the Government of Canada site. Remember, sending mail to your MP is free!

Michael Geist reports that the "Canadian" (and I put Canadian in quotes because it's exactly the same as the DMCA without fair-use provisions — an American entertainment industry bill) copyright legislation update is going to be most likely fast tracked in the new year and supported by the Conservative and Liberal (and most likely the Bloc) governments. The updated copyright legislation will be even worse than the last Canadian copyright proposal, the defeated Bill C-60.

The legislation will contain anti-circumvention clause that prohibits breaking the locks off your music and movies in order to move them to new devices or watch them after the company that made them goes out of business, or decides to stop authorizing you to watch your purchase. There will be no flexible fair-use ideals — no parody, time shifting (such as recording a TV show and watching it later when it is convenient for you), device shifting (copying a Music CD to your MP3 Player) or expanded backup provisions.

This legislation will make criminals out of most Canadians, whom participate in most of these activities on a daily basis. Please consider writing your Member of Parliament or following Michael Geist's 30 Things You Can Do about DMCA-like legislations.

Edit: I have made a post about ways to write your MP in regards to the current legislation attempt.